Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public
The issue of whether nowadays media broadcast their news less accurately compare to the past and this approach might cause more problems to the public aroused much controversy among people of different ages and different perspectives. Definitely, some people if, were asked would agree with the statements that in today’s world media does not care about the accuracy of news while others have a negative attitude toward this point of view. As far as I am concerned, I postulate nowadays, media like TV, newspapers, and Internet broadcast more precise news in comparison to the past. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on the arguments to support my view.
The first vital point to be mentioned is in the modern world, thanks to the advancement in technology, people have access to a great variety of news resources. This gets them a chance to evaluate the news they have heard by comparing them with various resources, as the important news reports by total news channels. If specific news channel wants to deceive audiences by fake news they become aware when watching and reading other resources. Therefore, there is less likely the producers generate incorrect information. While in the past people could acquire the news form limited resources which were more possible for inaccurate news.
In approaching this issue, apart from the reason given above, another reason that deserves some words is that the main target of these media is attracting more audiences and raise their company’s profit. They have to compete to other channels, thus, they attempt to hire professional people to assess everything that is going to announce and this way decline the risk of making mistakes. These specialists revise and review the materials, again and again, otherwise, they would be the loser of this competition. For instance, my father is a reporter of one of the local news channel, he states since, the first policy for their channel is the accuracy of the news, if someone makes a mistake in this field he might fire or get a heavy penalty. As you see, they gain more revenue, consequently, this item is significant for them.
By the way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion nowadays media care to the accuracy of what they broadcast as people can evaluate their news by watching various channels. Moreover, producers are inclined to appeal more viewer, thus, they hire specialists to accomplish this task more precisely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to accomplish this task more precisely.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for instance, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06097560976 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70250616277 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539024390244 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4243604117 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6875 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242615571835 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796223045762 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576389252419 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156870719408 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908739206186 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.