Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The knowledge we gain from personal experience is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books.

No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of gaining knowledge either from books or from personal experience. If I were asked to choose, I would definitely say that knowledge gain from personal experience is more valuable. It is my firm belief that personal experience helps you to develop a personality along with knowledge. I will develop these ideas in subsequent paragraphs with the number of examples.

To begin with, knowledge gain from observation and during practical classes or discussing the topic in the group makes higher impact on the brain. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. You see, I used to be a talkative student. I liked to discuss the topic with my friend which had helped me to memorize the concept faster. For this reason, I totally satisfied with the theme beacuse it helps me.

Secondly, parents love to share the information regarding any aspect like future decisions, happy marriage life advice and to spend a healthy life. Drawing from my own experience, my parents always worried about my marriage. He wants to choose the best boy for me but we children never realized that. They said when you become parents than you were let to know the responsibility of being a parent or family. It is certainly clear to see why these emotions, responsibility cannot be learnt from books.

In the light of the above mentioned reasons, I would have strongly believed that knowledge gain from personal experience teaches the best lesson in life and makes you a different person what you were before.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 274.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91605839416 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69260219095 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616788321168 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.620317048 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343850316336 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105214084188 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968232429284 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213463843988 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0970644371111 0.0645574589148 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.