Nowadays, in the hectic and complex world, the importance of leadership rise keenly. In this regard, some people believe that only particular people can be a leader of communities, and they were born with these characteristics, which means that they are instinctively born as a leader. However, others cast doubt on that and claim that every individual can be a good leader by practicing and hardworking. I, personally, agree with the first group, and believe that leadership comes naturally, for several conspicuous reasons which will be elaborated as follows.
To begin with, only a responsible person can be a leader, for people can easily trust them. It is crystal clear that a leader must accept the probable risks of misleadingly, and we cannot teach individuals to be responsible in rough situations. One of my childhood memories can drive this notion dramatically home. We wanted to elect one of the candidate students to solve a problem at school. Finally, most of the students voted to a person who was known as a responsible girl, for they could easily trust her, and sure that she could deal with the problem accurately. Since admitting the responsibility of probable fallacious is an instinct behavior, therefore, only these kinds of individuals can be a leader of societies.
Additionally, only a social person can absorb others’ attraction to be their leader, which is an instinct behavior. An example can shed some light on this subject. Trump, the president of America, is a person who can absorb individuals only by talking. He can easily tempt others to do whatever he wants only with negotiation. Therefore, sociability is one of the vital factors of leaders, which comes naturally.
All in all, there are several remarkable reasons, which is persuasive enough to admit that only some particular individuals can be leader, for ordinary people cannot learn it. I, totally, agree with this idea and support my viewpoint in the two previous paragraphs in detail.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the two previous paragraphs in detail.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 277.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07220216606 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90764586263 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552346570397 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8566878958 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.357142857 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189442656196 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665393650376 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431562941275 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117680353832 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470500720449 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.