I disagree with the statement because leadership is not a kind of talent. Leadership is a kind of ability to be a good leader in a team. It contains the skill to interact with members in your team and deal with complex situations of the outside world. Only by gaining experience from practice can one person become a good leader.
First and foremost, leadership comes from practice rather than talent. Leadership is composed of a great amount of experience and inner characteristic. The former one must be obtained in many times of practical work. Suppose you are leading a team to take part in a competition. If you have participated in similar competitions before, you will be familiar with every detail and procedure in the competition. Then you have the quality to be a leader because you have more experience than others. This kind of leadership comes from practice rather than talent.
What's more, leadership is hard to gain and does not come easily. Take the example mentioned above, even though you are familiar with the competition, you should have good skills in communication with other members of the team. It is quite interesting that if a team composed of the best players doesn't necessarily mean that the team is the best team. If the leader fails to build good communication in the team, the power of members in the team will not combine together.
However, everyone can learn leadership through experience. Leadership doesn't require a clever head or a strong body, but long times of experience and a brave heart to face difficulties. The president of a country is a leader, the captain of a ship is a leader, the center of a sports team is also a leader. That is to say, we can practice leadership in our life. For example, if you are going to study harder, why not form a study group and arrange some activities? If you are willing to do so, you can not only practice your leadership but also achieve a good friendship with others. Always remember that everyone can be a good leader.
In a nutshell, leadership is a kind of experience that does not come naturally. Although it takes time to have good leadership, you can practice leadership in every corner of your daily life. If you are willing to become a leader and learn from practical experience, you are sure to strengthen your leadership.
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-43: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage. 3
- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The "Voynich manuscript," as it became kno 80
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally; one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...es from practice rather than talent. Whats more, leadership is hard to gain and do...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... if a team composed of the best players doesnt necessarily mean that the team is the b...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...adership through experience. Leadership doesnt require a clever head or a strong body,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, for example, kind of, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75742574257 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8002084802 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430693069307 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.663445518 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.88 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.16 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288874720056 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932671663979 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532068224642 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185054466245 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478875985621 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.