It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation

I think it is important for the government to spend money on both improving Internet access and public transportation. Internet access is crucial to economic and social development, it carries information and connects the earth into a whole planet. Public transportation is the basic element of public facilities, it brings great convenience to the life of citizens.

Nowadays, more and more people use the Internet to finish their work and get knowledge online. With a high-speed Internet connection, people in the district can watch online courses to further their study and enjoy funny videos on YouTube to have a break. People will be more likely to immigrate to districts with good Internet connection, because it brings good experience of living. If the Internet access is poor, there will be a lot of troubles in our daily life. Just think of driving on the road, your phone can't find Internet signals, then the Google Map won't be able to provide precise navigation, the online music player will stop the music. No Internet access will lead to a bad day. So government should spend money to improve Internet access.

Also, public transportation is not something we can neglect. Although private cars are quite popular in many developed countries, there is always some moments we have to turn to public transportation. Suppose you are on a trip to Toronto, unfortunately, there is a winter storm. If you can't get on a taxi or a subway, it will be quite hard to go back to the hotel, let alone the freezing cold on the street. On the other hand, public transportation is more environment-friendly than private cars. When carrying the same number of people, private cars produce more harmful gas and takes more petrol than buses or subways. As a whole, it is wise for the government to spend money on public transportation.

If the government spends money to improve Internet access and public transportation, citizens can go anywhere in the district and browse anything in the world. That kind of good facilities will surely attract a huge crowd of people to live here. With such a large market, many companies will also choose to build factories and offices in the district. Internet access and public transportation are also key elements of a good tourist destination. Everyone wants to travel with ease and stay connected to the Internet.
There is no denying that good public transportation and Internet access will lead to economic growth.

In a nutshell, the government should spend money on both Internet access and public transportation. These two crucial public facilities lead to good life experience for the citizens. They can also be a great help in leading economic growth.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er their study and enjoy funny videos on YouTube to have a break. People will be ...
^^
Line 4, column 517, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hink of driving on the road, your phone cant find Internet signals, then the Google ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 287, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nately, there is a winter storm. If you cant get on a taxi or a subway, it will be q...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, i think, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03340757238 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93693584114 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478841870824 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0430461928 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9230769231 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2692307692 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11538461538 5.45110844103 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471029494674 0.236089414692 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14219280084 0.076458572812 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154910212942 0.0737576698707 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261398837563 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842082531179 0.0645574589148 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.