Home >> .

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The more money a person has, the more should he or she give away to charities.

Essay topics: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The more money a person has, the more should he or she give away to charities.

mitra-goli2041's picture

Charities have become increasingly a controversial issue among people owing to extremely different opinion in this regard. One pivotal question which comes up here is that whether the more money a person has, the more should he or she give away to charity. While an overwhelming majority firmly believes that people who earn more money absolutely make efforts, therefore, they should enjoy more their money rather than give their money to charities, others hold the opposite perspective. In my opinion, it is reasonable that charity is the proportion in with how much money individual makes owing to some highlighted reasons. The following paragraphs will substantially elaborate on my points of view.
The most exquisite point is that helping other people is our moral task so when we are able to afford money for poor people, we should do it. For instance, there are catastrophic situations which some people significantly need others to help like a natural disaster and incurable diseases. For example, last year, unfortunately, one city in my country was destroyed in an enormous earthquake, therefore, people in that city needed help and I think it clearly was everyone duty to help them but the people who had more money can help them more than others. Consequently, the more money you earn, the more you should give to charities.
Another notable reason which is worth mentioning is that giving money to charities not only did help other people for leading a more convenient life but also is beneficial for the person who helps. One important requirement which satisfies us is being a positive person. Humans had a different type of necessities like food, sleep, and home. But after providing initial requirement we should provide the satisfaction of our soul which is being a beneficial and valued person. When a person has more money hence they should meet this requirement for their feeling. One recent survey in this regard has been accomplished in the Yale University to discover the association between human feeling and how much charities they give. It indicates that humans noticeably feel better about themselves when they give money to charities or help other people.
Another remarkable reason which significantly confirms my viewpoint is that life is combined of action and reaction. It means that when you do a nice work in the world, it would benefit you in the end. For instance, my mother always helped people who suffer from incurable diseases like cancer. This nice job benefits her too so she is healthy.
To sum up, taking all the aforementioned factors into consideration, we might come to the result that people who made money, should necessarily give more money to charity. Also, we should consider the noticeable point that human being should help each other in catastrophic situations like a natural disaster and incurable diseases. I recommend that everyone endeavor to help others people as much as it is possible for them to make others human life more convenient. It would surely make them even happier and richer owing to a pleasant feeling of being a nice person.

Essay Categories: 
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
More essays by this user:



Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gives'.
Suggestion: gives
...a person has, the more should he or she give away to charity. While an overwhelming ...
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...sociation between human feeling and how much charities they give. It indicates that ...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.0286738351 245% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2595.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 513.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05847953216 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74704174499 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493177387914 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 830.7 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.084013046 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31275460509 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959523127584 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117427134904 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181898723392 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090826883546 0.0645574589148 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.