Both the reading and the lecture is about the reasons for little ice age. The passage presents three reasons while the lecturer refutes them all, casting doubt on every single point.
First, the author claims that melted glaciers had caused a tremendous amount of cold water releasing into the gulf stream. Thus, these cold fresh water decrease the environmental temperature. In opposition, the lecture proves that it is wrong because disrupting ocean just occurred in some specific places like Europe but little ice age was not merely in that places.
Second, the reading mentions the effects of volcanoes. The dust of volcanoes eruption made a cloud preventing sunlight from getting to earth. Conversely, the professor makes it clear that from the available evidence the volcanoes eruption was not strong enough to decrease the environmental temperature causing little ice age. Because little ice age formation needed a large amount of eruption that dramatically created dust into the atmosphere whereas there is no report proving this claim.
Third, the reading asserts that declining of the greenhouse effect due to increasing of trees is another reason. As human populations diminished, there was obviously fewer need for agriculture thus the debris land became forests. Growing trees at forest utilize carbon dioxide, therefore, mitigating the greenhouse effect. The lecturer completely dismisses this view, stating that this effect needed a long time while there was not enough time to cool the environment to turn it to the ice age. This indicates that greenhouse effect was not the cause.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'volcanoes'' or 'volcano's'?
Suggestion: volcanoes'; volcano's
...ar that from the available evidence the volcanoes eruption was not strong enough to decre...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, so, therefore, third, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37698412698 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6168431078 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4995308443 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7857142857 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410646467473 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125483853592 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793018066395 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226272787094 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699202504888 0.0443174109184 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.