Both the lecture and the passage is about the migration hypothesis of Edmontosaurus. The migration hypothesis states that Edmontosaurus migrated in the winter as they can survive in a more hospitable place. The passage proves this assumption by asserting three reasons while the professor casts doubt on every single proof by some evidence.
To begin with, the author mentions that they were obliged to immigrate because there were not enough plants. Plants could not grow in the cold temperature of the north scope. Edmontosaurus were herbivorous so they should find somewhere else to feed on. Conversely, the speaker dismisses this claim by asserting that the temperature of North Slope was extremely higher than today's temperature. In the summer, the sunshine caused lots of plants to grow, as a result, there was plenty of food. In addition, in winter there was enough nutrient for them to survive. Thus they did not need to migrate.
Secondly, the reading asserts that there is some evidence indicating that Edmontosaur lived in herd. Many modern animals living in herd migrate therefor Edmontosaur did it too. The lecturer refutes this reason by an example of some modern animal. There are some animals which live in herd but they do not migrate. Living in herd is not a convincing reason for this hypothesis as it has some other benefits except easier migration.
Third, the passage proves that Edmonosaurs were able to migrate long distance because they were fast enough for their journy. In the opposition, the professor mentions juveniles which were not as fast as adults. Juveniles could not be capable of immigration and the adults did not leave them alone, thus, they did not migrate in the winter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 562, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...as enough nutrient for them to survive. Thus they did not need to migrate. Second...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, second, secondly, so, third, thus, while, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10992907801 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64171069205 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539007092199 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3067958511 49.2860985944 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.0555555556 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.27373068433 328% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271510759233 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878276144986 0.0996497079465 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695030519486 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155703161057 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031590077837 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.