According to the passage, the author states that living on the venus in impossible for humans owing to several highlighted reasons. However, the professor casts doubt on this claim and rejects each of the authors' point by providing some counter argument which will be explained in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, the passage implies that atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface would crush human as well as it crushed all spacecraft which have landed on Venus. In the opposition, the speaker declares that the station for humans can be located higher than Venus surface where the atmospheric pressure is as same as earth. Therefore, it would be conceivable for humans to live there.
In addition, lack of water and oxygen is another problem has mentioned by the passage which cannot be provided from earth supply but this issue can be solved in the professor view. The professor adds that there are chemical compounds on the venus which can be used for oxygen and water production.
Finally, the passage argues that there is not enough sun for meeting the energy needed for machines and equipment due to densely clouds of carbon dioxide. The professor proclaims that the human also can use the energy of the sun which is reflected by clouds.
In conclusion, while, the passage posits that it is not plausible for humans to live on the Venus, the professor refuses this claim.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95708154506 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47934234479 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549356223176 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6519840702 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322619754124 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140867589337 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844930285473 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172666202532 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106557258686 0.0443174109184 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.