Both the lecture and the reading are about the authenticity of Peary's' journey to the North Pole. While the passage asserts that he truly reached the North Pole by presenting some reasons, the lecture completely refutes these claims with evidence.
First, the passage states that a committee investigated peary's records and equipment. The committee confirmed that he reached there, however, the professor dismisses this claim. The committee was composed of Peary 's friend and they were biased, therefore, their conformity is not trustworthy.
Second, the reading argues that he can reach the North Pole in only 37 days as another person named Tom Avery did this journey in less than 37 days. On the contrary, the lecturer argues that the conditions of these two journeys were different for instance Avery did not carry foods and airplane carried foods for him. Also, the weather conditions were different. Thus, Avery experience is not convincing that Peary reached there.
Third, the author explains that Peary 's photographs are another proof. They measure the shadow in these photographs and make it clear that the sun's position from photographs correspond to what it should have been at the North Pole. In the opposition, the professor explains that the photographs were taken by a primitive camera thus the photographs are not well enough for this method. In addition, the shadow on the photographs was faded and could not be used for this technic.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16455696203 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60956052254 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3106276188 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1538461538 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476751933482 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156543574474 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770866815973 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26495783918 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165272482513 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.