Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important investment for a company is to spend money to improve the work skills of its employees.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that large corporations conducted various tasks to help improve and develop their situations and conditions, in order to reach a conspicuous success in the long run. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether companies should spend a hoard of money as an investment to heighten employees' skills and experiences. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that spend money to enhance workers' ability and skills could guarantee the success of the company in the long run. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, mammoth corporations always have played a consequential role in any given society owing to the fact that they provide fertile ground for human beings to find a decent and well-paid job and accumulate a vast sum of money. Generally phrased, the success of a company largely depends on its employees and invest a substantial amount of budget on workers' skills not only can guarantee the success of the company but also can prevent something disruptive from arising. As a tangible example, in the car factory in my hometown, the government did not spend some money train employees how to deal with trials and tribulations. A couple of years ago, employees made a small mistake in the company and a huge disaster bankrupt the company just due to the paucity of skills. To elucidate more on this issue, without skills and knowledge hardly can a company succeed owing to the fact that they contribute greatly to the company to make a progress day in day out.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that spend some money to improve employees' skills will develop the productivity of the company. If we take a minute to ponder over it. The more productivity, the more money can the company make. As a matter of fact, productivity plays a key role in every particular company due to the fact that it is one of the significant factors that help the corporation lasting. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that it is necessarily needed for the companies to spend a huge amount of money on employees' skills because not only can it improve productivity but also it can patronize the company to succeed.
However, every coin has two sides. Spend a hoard of money to improve skills and experiences of humans might not be a wise decision. Instead, the company could invest a large amount of money on advertisement. In fact, advertising can provide an opportunity for the company to appeal myriads of costumes. So not only can a company make more money but also can become well-known in all corner of the world. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal stance.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether companies should spend a hoard of money...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...evelop the productivity of the company. If we take a minute to ponder over it. The...
^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, well, as to, in fact, as a matter of fact, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2487.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81044487427 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76548669757 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473887814313 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 789.3 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2865815688 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.619047619 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237668300787 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748253351475 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522685448372 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130638391022 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677683371731 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.