Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The most important investment for a company is to spend money to improve the work skills of its employees.
Every company seeks the most appropriate way to gain a competitive advantage over its competitors and increase productivity. Managers try to implement methods to see a higher return on their investments. Some people are of the opinion that the best way to reach this goal is to promote workers' skills. I, myself, disagree with this statement because of two reasons which will be outlined below.
First and foremost, In my opinion, one major factor in determining the company's success is the employee's level of motivation to get their tasks done. A company cannot achieve its goal unless its employees are eager to work for the company. They should consider themselves as a member of a family. In order to do so, the company's leaders can allocate a specific budget to some extra benefits. these benefits can run the gamut from small things like celebrating employees' birthdays to giving financial aids or health insurance. If employees receive adequate compensation from the company, they will become more focused on their tasks, and as a result, the company will move toward its vision.
Secondly, on the lists of factors which determine the prosperity of a company, having access to the latest technologies and trends ranks near the top. A company will not benefit from its highly skilled workers if it does not employ the facilities that are used by competitors. Using up-to-date software and methods can boost productivity and decrease costs simultaneously. My personal experience is a great example of this. I remembered that our company had used the traditional method to control the level of its inventory. However, the employees were experienced enough, the errors were inevitable, and the number of them was increasing every day. Our manager decided to use the latest method and replaced the old-fashioned one with computerized technology, and the correctness rate turned to the normal level. This replacement did not cost the company a lot, but the returns were significant.
To sum up, I think there are other major factors which have a tremendous return on company's investment, instead of increasing employees skill. Improving employees can be beneficial to the overall performance of the company to some extends, but a company will not take advantage of this factor unless it has motivated employees and the latest technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 392, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...specific budget to some extra benefits. these benefits can run the gamut from small t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...panys investment, instead of increasing employees skill. Improving employees can be benef...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, i think, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16842105263 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8917975508 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576315789474 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7796338301 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216798105957 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597486917552 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588841858028 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130535918029 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344081935786 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.