Nowadays, relationships have become more complicated due to the increasing use of technology to communicate as well as inadequate time to be spent on in-person relationships. Consequently, people have fewer opportunities to learn about each other. While some people believe that one of the best ways to know about a person's characteristics is noticing her favourite movies and books, I think this is not an appropriate way to judge someone's personality. In what follows, I will pinpoint the two most prominent reasons to elaborate on my viewpoint.
First and foremost, while the category of movies one likes has everything to do with his/her feelings, the cause of interest in a specific genre may be completely different from person to person. Some people like a particular type of movie to intensify their inner feelings. In contrast, other people like that genre to compensate for the lack of some emotions inside them. For example, some people are interested in comedy movies because they are sad inside and want to balance their feelings, but other ones may like the same movies since they have inner happiness and want to boost their bliss. As a result, it is misleading to judge people's personality types by their favourite movies.
Secondly, as humankind's nature desires variety, many people like various types of movies and books, and they don't have a particular taste. People may watch a movie or read a book that is consistent with their temporary and constantly changing moods. In addition, regarding books they read, many people are inclined towards the books written by well-known authors without considering the subject of books. For instance, I like watching many types of movies. When I am sad, I like to see action movies, when I am stressed, I prefer comedy ones, when I am with my friends we watch romance and horror movies and so on. So, if I was asked my favourite movie genre, I could not name just one category. Undoubtedly, those kind of people who like different kinds of movies and books are neither complex nor fickle. So, the conclusion about one's personality according to these criteria leads to a superficial judgement.
In a nutshell, it's not logical to decide about one's attributes through their affection to a certain type of movies or books because the reason for the interest in a specific category is different occasionally, and many people like a wide spectrum of books and movies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ous types of movies and books, and they dont have a particular taste. People may wat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 710, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...ot name just one category. Undoubtedly, those kind of people who like different kinds of m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 833, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ex nor fickle. So, the conclusion about ones personality according to these criteria...
^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tshell, its not logical to decide about ones attributes through their affection to a...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a wide spectrum of books and movies.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in contrast, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00740740741 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82780843295 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0381154028 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72222222222 5.45110844103 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269406741652 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897103984737 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557251105011 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16992293133 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261379618582 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.