Due to the advancement of technology and the presence of attractive and fascinating hobbies for students, they are less willing to study and do their assignments. Consequently, students are more likely to cheat in doing their school works to avoid poor grades. It is a major concern for parents and teachers to prevent children from cheating on their homework assignments. There are different actions taken by parents and teachers to achieve this goal. Among these actions, in my opinion, the most effective one is controlling students by their parents, and I will demonstrate my viewpoint in the following essay.
First and foremost, parents know their children's personality and characteristics better than anyone else, and they can have a more long-term effect on their children. Since teachers do not have so much interaction with students, they usually do not know well about different students' attributes. Every child is like a puzzle that takes a very long time to solve, and it is unreasonable to adopt the same approach to prevent all of them from cheating in doing their homework. In contrast, parents spend a considerable amount of time with their children and know well about their traits and behaviors. As a result, they can choose the best way to dissuade their children from cheating. For example, my brother used to cheat on his assignments. My parents realized this problem and thought about how to stop him from cheating. They knew well that my brother loves getting prizes because of their experience. Also, they knew that he always got good grades but did not study well because he was reluctant to study after a long school summer break, resting all the time and playing games. So, in order to get him back to his line of studying, they persuaded him to do his homework on his own to receive prizes. Consequently, he started to study hard to do his assignments on his own while my parents were checking him. As a result, after some time, he got out of the summer vacation mood and was trying hard just like the years before, even without receiving a prize! If my parent had not been aware of my brother's personality, he would have continued cheating all that year.
Moreover, by always occupied by students' cheating problems, teachers would not be able to concentrate well on their teaching work. Checking students and always trying to prevent them from cheating and finding methods to solve this issue wastes teachers' energy and distracts them from other important aspects of their profession. So it is more logical for parents to take the responsibility of solving the problem with their children cheating. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Three years ago, I was a mathematics teacher in a high school. I found out that some students do not do their homework on their own and copy their classmates' answers. So, I decided to assign different homework for each student. That was a terrible experience for me, since some nights, I had to stay up all night to determine individual assignments for my students, and I felt tired the morning after. So I had to put most of my energy to determine and grade many different assignments rather than prepare for my classes. If their parents had controlled them, I would not have had such an exhausting teaching experience that year.
In a nutshell, I think being controlled by their parents is the best method to prevent students from cheating because parents are well familiar with their children's characteristics and because it causes distraction of teachers and extra work pressure on them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 959, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ost of my energy to determine and grade many different assignments rather than prepare for my ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, i think, in contrast, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 85.0 43.0788530466 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2985.0 1977.66487455 151% => OK
No of words: 605.0 407.700716846 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93388429752 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95951083803 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7438335157 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451239669421 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 885.6 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5138261745 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.607142857 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6071428571 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220934992086 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731788499903 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054540818399 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166123769126 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356747187502 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.