I strongly agree with the statement. the superior resasons why i choose to advocate this concept are that we can't find all the information we need in a single source. Additionaly, the information need to be proper, trustworhty and from different aspects of an issue which with the extention of the technology and social madia is rare now. Thus, it is an obligatory to search into different resources for gathering info.
Information is the basis requirement for making decisions and in order to make a rational one we need to be acommulated with enough amount of insight throw the subject we are researching about. Diffrences in personalities and as a result varieties in interests amoung people is the first reason to support the claim that a single source can not provide all the information we need. Therefore, for preventing potential errors in future we should elaborate our knowledge with as many resources as possible.
Secondly, not everyone adherent some projects or people. Thus, it can be expected that we run into wrong information in a website or a magazine. Sometimes these newes are only to make money or there are other sabotaging porposes behind them like making a gossip, destroying one's public face just from jealousy or attracting audience from the fans or haters of an indivitual. Hence, same thing and story runs for other stories or topics. Thus, for asuring from the fact that we aren't being fooled or our thoughts aren't getting manipulated by the political plays behind it we should look for many other resources than the first one.
At last, reading about different ideas upon a single fact or an issue sometimes inspire us with the solution that we are in quest of. For instance, as for my personal experience, I wanted to have a research on a topic in university but where to start was a huge problem for me. Accordingly, I started talking to my professors and each of the provided me with a picture in my mind that what would they do if they were me and started walking in my shoes. But, I didn't stop and started reading some other articles and researvhes in that area. At the end my research entitiled the best student research of the year.
Consequently, I believe different resources have more superiorities and advantages than we think they have. Thus, we should make oulrselves in some challenge to gain enough, adequate, resonable information beforem aking any choices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
I strongly agree with the statement. the superior resasons why i choose to advoc...
^^^
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...he statement. the superior resasons why i choose to advocate this concept are tha...
^
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...se to advocate this concept are that we cant find all the information we need in a s...
^^^^
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dge with as many resources as possible. Secondly, not everyone adherent some pro...
^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...Thus, for asuring from the fact that we arent being fooled or our thoughts arent gett...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...t we arent being fooled or our thoughts arent getting manipulated by the political pl...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...y personal experience, I wanted to have a research on a topic in university but where to s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 460, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...and started walking in my shoes. But, I didnt stop and started reading some other art...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, first, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as for, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8756097561 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79044963424 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2345460909 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.210526316 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145688681519 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487243752476 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473982640025 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846260659696 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042838751558 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.