Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Generally speaking, children learn mostly elementary knowledge from their parents. Some people believe that parents are the best ones who can guide the growing children. In my opinion, I don't agree with the points. There are several cases showing that parents aren't always considerate to their kids. They might ruin the lives of their children for some reason instead of guarding them with selfless love.
First of all, not every parent is able to teach his/her children properly. Some people have trouble with their emotional control or the abnormal concept of value, so they might not be the optimum ones for teaching children. For example, my aunt Mandy is an emotional person. Her 6-year-old daughter, which is my little cousin, is often scolded badly for negligible things, such as dropping some crumbs on the table or leaving her stationery on the school. When the last time I saw my cousin in my family gathering, she was blaming the other kid just for the reason that the kid touched her doll without asking her, and her tone and action were exactly like her mother. That's how a parent's bad behavior brings negative influences on a child.
Furthermore, some parents raise their children, not for selfless love. What they seek is to make a profit from children in the future. The traditional Chinese parents regard their children as private property. From their perspective, children must listen to all the parents' commands and requirements, which means that children cannot have their own opinions, and must follow the path parents have planned for them. Unfortunately, my parents are classic traditional Chinese parents. They asked me to be a doctor in the future and tried to force me when I was choosing an academic team in high school. In Taiwan, only the students in the biological team can apply for the colleges of medicine, and the doctor is the highest-paying job. Apart from my parents, there are thousands of parents in Taiwan force their children to become what the parents want instead of what children like.
In summary, parents play important roles in children's growth, but definitely, they are not the best teachers for children. People start learning how to be parents when they become parents, so it is normal that many of them are not good at educating children. For me, the most appropriate teachers for kids are those have considerable expertise in education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... the growing children. In my opinion, I dont agree with the points. There are severa...
^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... are several cases showing that parents arent always considerate to their kids. They ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...nd action were exactly like her mother. Thats how a parents bad behavior brings negat...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a parent' or simply 'parents'?
Suggestion: a parent; parents
...were exactly like her mother. Thats how a parents bad behavior brings negative influences...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, so, apart from, for example, in summary, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.995 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53845917832 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8010560028 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8181818182 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092080597749 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357180222234 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308414955074 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678476699521 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299524852169 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.