Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
The lecture and the reading are both about Austrian composer Franz Schubert's 8th Symphony, which is written in two movements and different from four movements of Classical symphony. The author of the reading thinks that the two-movement symphony was exactly what Schubert intended. However, the lecturer believes that Schubert tried to write a four-movement piece but was unable to complete it.
First, the lecturer argues against the author's opinion that Schubert created the two movements in order to break out of the Classical mold. He says that the 8th Symphony was written at the end of the Classical period, and thus followed the Classical symphony structure. There is no reason to believe that Schubert wanted to deviate from the norm of four movements.
Second, the author states that both movements of the 8th Symphony are written in the same meter, and therefore the author suggests that Schubert would only write two movements. The lecturer disputes this point by citing that old manuscripts have been found, proving that Schubert attempted to write the last two movements.
Third, the lecturer refers to the evidence of the ordinary third movement that exists, making the case that Schubert could be unsatisfied with "Unfinished Symphony", and he probably tried to write the remaining movements. This opinion contradicts the reading, which maintains that Schubert must have been happy with the two-movement symphony because of its great popularity with worldwide audiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... First, the lecturer argues against the authors opinion that Schubert created the two m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43162393162 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75894007011 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8241350184 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.1 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0543601791609 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0266863763616 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265024357238 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0368914107649 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157557379909 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.