Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading is mainly about a beautifully illustrated handwritten book. The author of the passage believes that there are three explanations of the origin of the book. However, the lecturer finds them dubious and casts a shadow on the comments. He believes that the reasons are incorrect.
First and foremost, the author asserts that the writer of the book may have been originated from scientific or magical work, and Anthony Aschman was the writer because he illustrated plants similar to the pictures of the book. On the contrary, the lecturer brings up the point that Aschman was an ordinary scientist, and he obtained his information from other scientific resources. For example, he wrote A little herbal based on well – known books that were available at that time.
Furthermore, the reading states that the texts of the book were unreal, and Edward Kelly gained a lot of money by pretending it as a precious book to rich people. In contrast, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that sixteen century people were straightforward to deceive, and it did not need much effort to make it complicated. The book was written based on real code, and he could use some simpler suited for his purpose.
Finally, the reading argues that the writer of the book is Voynich because he was a book dealer, and he tried to make some antique books to be sold. Conversely, the lecturer underlines the fact that one can not conclude that it was his work based on volume and ink of old books. He mentions that Voynich should have utilized the kind of ink which was used in forthy hundred years ago to show the book was ancient.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, for example, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76408450704 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55435601976 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545774647887 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3719562747 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.076923077 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0343498913128 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.013762556619 0.0996497079465 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0215583623643 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0226167324221 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00470737648871 0.0443174109184 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.