Do you agree or disagree? People nowadays are more
willing to help other people (giving food or clothing)
than in the past.
There is no doubt that nowadays, the income gap has increased among people in a country, and the number of vulnerable people has increased as well. The most significant reason that arises here is whether other people help them more than in the past or not. Although some people believe that people are not as generous as they were, others, including me, believe that people help others in terms of food and clothing, because money has become accessible for many people and people are much more informed about vulnerable people.
The first and foremost reason that people have become eager to help other people is that the level of income of the majority of people has increased, so they would be able to help others. People in the past were at the same level, and the differences between poor and rich were not high; however, these days, a lot of people are engaging with poverty. As a result of increasing income, people are more interested in contributing to society. Take my father as an example. They are six siblings, and he told me whenever his father wanted to buy something for children, he had some difficulties, because he did not have enough money to purchase for his children, let alone helping other people. My father was hired in the army, and he could recover all of me and my two brothers' expenses. Besides, they would help some people by providing cloth and money for them. Had my father's income not been enough to meet his family needs, he would not have been able to help others. In my view, the most important reason that increased my parents' willing to help people was their adequate income.
The other equally reason is that people have become more informed about the poor's situations. There are some institutes and charities which apprise the rich people about the poor conditions. We also witness that people get a lot of information about people who are in harsh situations due to, for example, some natural disasters. Therefore, the level awareness of people has enhanced. To be more specific, individuals live in communities that they do not in touch with poor people. Although we may see them around the city, we do not know much about them; thus, we do not how to help them. For instance, there are a lot of children in my country who work in tough situations, and they do not have any supports. A nongovernmental organization that helps them provided information about their shortages, and they devised some programs to help them. One program was attaining enough money to prepare warm food for them, and I could see how many people participated in this plan. One can conclude that the more information people get about poor people, the more people are eager to help them to mitigate their suffering.
In conclusion, I think that people have become more keen of helping poor people in terms of their initial needs. This is because not has their income increased, and they would be capable of supporting their families and the poor, but institutes and other organizations have a pivotal role in raising the awareness of people about poor people conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of people about poor people conditions.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2560.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 535.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78504672897 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50041205443 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426168224299 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 811.8 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9757364409 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2916666667 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315806646893 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112184777396 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748922324369 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232811174435 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653958326513 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.