Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Some people argue that parents of early generation were more concern towards the education and engage in their academic activities of their children than modern era. They cite that contemporary parents are involved in the entertainment and other stuffs than education. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that parents of todays era for more devotion in their children's academic than parents of early ages for following two reasons.

To commence, guidance of this technology era are more participate in their children education because they are aware that education is the key way to succeed in this globalization world. For instance, all work-places such as schools, multinational companies and other sectors want to hire the qualified educated employee. Moreover, for establishing the own company education is a main gate-way which opens the doors of success and parents encourages their child to compete in today commercialized planet for success. On other hand, at past parents encourages their children in farm work rather than education. It is important to success in the career in this competitive world because if we don't succeed, then we might not raise our family according to this harsh modern era. Thus, the guardian are more contemplate than past.

Furthermore, the parents of blooming technology period are more concerned in the academic performance of their children to help their children in their study materials. For example, parents of today are aware of all study resources such as newspapers, article, book, internet and so forth. Indeed, they help their children to search the study materials to make their children renown person in the future and to guide to choose the right career. Nonetheless, parents in stone age only teach their children to graze their cattle and engage in the banal agriculture stuffs in traditional way. It is crucial to help in the study materials for children because the study resources are the enormous and gigantic treasure for the students to secure high score and knowledge for accomplish the success in the life. Therefore, the mother and father of modern generation involved in the better education of children than stone ages parents.

To sum up, whether the parents of the previous generation are more serious about their children education are complex. Some suggested that modern parents choose entertainment over their children academic performance. Nevertheless, I still contend that contemporary parents are more concerned about the education of their children because parents are aware that education is key way to success in life and their presence help to allocate the study materials essential for their children.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 692, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...in this competitive world because if we dont succeed, then we might not raise our fa...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2307.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40281030445 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76876204313 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456674473068 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 718.2 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0932463845 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7222222222 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336807967112 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135437439405 0.076458572812 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753492358754 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250107374101 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658393610198 0.0645574589148 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 692, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...in this competitive world because if we dont succeed, then we might not raise our fa...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2307.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40281030445 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76876204313 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456674473068 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 718.2 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0932463845 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7222222222 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336807967112 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135437439405 0.076458572812 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753492358754 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250107374101 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658393610198 0.0645574589148 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.