do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what kind of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future?
The world, in which we live, has undergone enormous transitions, throughout history, and professions and ability to predict their future is not an exception. In this line of thought so many people believe in today's era it is easier to determine what types of jobs would be a promising job. Others, on the contrary, Stand on the other side on the continuum. I, personally, concur with the latter notion because of two reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, economic pattern of a nation or the universe was more predictable in the past. TO be more specific, in today's societies economy of a country every day experience sudden bloom or recession thanks to the internal or even external parameters. In this condition it is not easy to predict what will happen in a career. For example, in recent months petroleum engineers who were known for having a good job with satisfactory salaries are losing their job because of dramatic drop in oil price. on the contrary, in the past because of stable condition of nations and also low level of receiving impact from other countries it was easier to anticipate future of a job.
Secondly, in the past the social status of a job was representing it's revenue. In the other word, it was easier for previous generation to figure out how would be future of job because individuals were payed according to the social status of a job. For example, everyone knew that teachers would have a successful job and workers would receive lower salary. However, in today's lives innovation and creativity paly crucial role in jobs success. In fact, some people are making huge money from certain careers which were a subsistence jobs in the past. For example, a barber by creating a website and cutting heir at people's house can make more money even than a doctor.
Lastly, some people, on the other hand, might say today's various job opportunities assist individuals to find their promising job. At first glance this claim may sound completely true, but this statement should be considered precisely. As matter of fact, in spite of the wide various job opportunities and sophisticated statistical analysis in modern careers rate of unemployment have increased compared to the past and people are continually shifting from a job to another.
To wrap it up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons bring us to the conclusion that in past decades it is easier to identify what job would be secure. For, economical status of nations was stable and because jobs were known for people and individuals knew what should they expect from a job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'months'' or 'month's'?
Suggestion: months'; month's
...pen in a career. For example, in recent months petroleum engineers who were known for ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 503, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... because of dramatic drop in oil price. on the contrary, in the past because of st...
^^
Line 6, column 164, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...identify what job would be secure. For, economical status of nations was stable and becaus...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in fact, in spite of, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91176470588 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76742336694 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524886877828 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 4.94265232975 405% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6478991067 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.55 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279971492188 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870607963347 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548452813254 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16411278849 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389783499078 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.