Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The world, in which we live, has ceaselessly undergone enormous transitions. one day invention of cars were the most intriguing invention of the human being but over the time it turned into the destructive machine which influenced every aspect of our lives. In this line of thought, so many people hold the conviction that in less than a couple of decades there will be fewer cars in use rather than what is being used today. Others, on the contrary, stand on the other side of the continuum. I, personally concur with the former notion because of man's advancement in technology and environmental problems, which I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, everyday human beings introduce new types of vehicles that are more convenient than their previous generation. To be more specific, living in the age of technology leads the modern era world to the fastest pace of development which it ever experienced. Every day scientists and researchers come up with new innovation and ideas which cause a revolution in an specific field of study. As long as cars and traffic congestion in virtually all developed countries are a serious problem, researchers are working on some clear and convenient way of transportation and the have taken some unprecedented steps such as supper high-velocity trains and cars which can fly and they are using a trial version of them in some countries. Thus, it is hoped that finding a new generation of vehicles helps us to get rid of cars.
Secondly, cars are a considerable source of pollution in today's era. To clarify more, in spite of the remarkable popularity of cars in modern societies, they are at the top of the list of environmental threateners and via the emission of CO2 the play important role in deterioration environment. In these circumstances, it is generally accepted that replacing cars with other fewer pollutant vehicles is inevitable. Therefore, it seems reasonable to find some other vehicles to replace care with them and help the earth ecosystem.
to wrap it up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons bring us to the conclusion that we will not see cars in the streets in 20 years from now. For, the unfulfilling eagerness of the human being to progress and because of the negative influence of the overuse of cars on the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...elessly undergone enormous transitions. one day invention of cars were the most int...
^^^
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...scientists and researchers come up with new innovation and ideas which cause a revolution in a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...n and ideas which cause a revolution in an specific field of study. As long as car...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...th them and help the earth ecosystem. to wrap it up, contemplating all the afore...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, such as, in spite of, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96401028278 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02473594945 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570694087404 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4292318081 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6875 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3125 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2337515317 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671772842789 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677778479391 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135928644169 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472336191031 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.