Today students are more interested in politics than the past. Do you agree or disagree
The world, in which we live, has ceaselessly undergone enormous transition, and the people, including students, involvement in the political events is not an exception. In this line of thought so many people hold the conviction that today's pupils are more interested in politics rather than what they were in the previous decades. Others, on the other hand, stand on the other side of the continuum. I, personally, concur with the former notion because of student access to the political topics and the sort of the materials which are being taught in today's educational centers.
To begin with, living in today's modern societies, let the student be aware of what is going on around them. To be more specific, in the past lack of widespread communication methods and mass media turned every society into a closed community in which people in that were only informed about tasks in which they were involved. However, in today's modern era individuals, more specifically students are using the internet and social networking sites every day and moment which brings them the opportunity of being aware of all political events, such as elections, around them. on another side, political parties and groups today are using internet and mass media such as social networking sites and newspaper as a common way in advertising their goals and policy, therefore, students are more than anyone else exposed to the political news and these topics which have been always intriguing for all, attract them.
Secondly, past generation students were taught only about basic items such as math and science. To clarify more, in today's school students are aware of political changes in society thanks to the withe variety of related lessons and courses such as history, anthropology, social science, to name but a few. In these circumstances, students have access to the information which is needed to help them to be interested in politics. For example, I, decided to be a parliament man in the future because the information in the textbooks and articles, related to the courses that I took, helped me to learn about a congressman’s responsibilities and duties, and the way that they can help people in the community.
To wrap it up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons bring us to the conclusion that today's students are more interested in politics rather than what the previous generation did. For, they have more access to political news and because the materials which are being taught in today's schools are more related to politics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 574, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...events, such as elections, around them. on another side, political parties and gro...
^^
Line 2, column 860, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
...e political news and these topics which have been always intriguing for all, attract them. Se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 911, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lways intriguing for all, attract them. Secondly, past generation students were ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, sort of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09375 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78590628114 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483173076923 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3890247667 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.357142857 100.406767564 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7142857143 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28762004652 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111794965573 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072065047445 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207418581036 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532308458326 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.