Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appraciated and valued by societiy in the past than they were nowadays.
Throughout history, the world, in which we live, has ceaselessly undergone enormous transitions, and teacher’s social status is not an exception. In this line of thought, so many people take the view that in today's rea tutors are more appreciated than what they were in the past decades. Other, on the contrary, stand on the other side of the continuum. I, personally, concur with the latter notion because of the two reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the first and foremost reason which comes to mind substantiating my opinion is that modern era's teachers are not the only source of information as they were in the past decades. To be more specific, with the genesis of the technology and, most importantly, the internet individuals can easily find all information that they want on a notice of moment. In fact, by only typing down some key works, hundreds of valuable page of data could be fined readily. However, in the past, teachers were the only source of the education in the societies and they had better social status.
The second reason that deserve some word here is that being a teacher in the past was a hard task. To clarify more, as a result of low number of educated people in the past having acsses to knowledgeable individuals was not as easy as it is today. In fact, people who liked to be a teacher had to put tremendous time and effort to learn stuff and even had to travel long distances to gain knowledge and this hard try to acquire information turned them into a valuable figure in the societies. On the contrary, today learning process have been facilitated thanks to the technology. In addition, today’s people are not reluctant to share their knowledge and millions of educational video clips and article are available on the webs. Thus, difficulty in learning and gaining knowledge had turned past instructors to appreciated individuals in the past generation.
Lastly, some people, on the other hand might say that today’s teachers are more appreciated because today’s tutors receive more salary than what they were earning in the past. This claim may sound completely true, at first glance, but to answer this statement it should be considered more precisely. In fact, salary level would not present the social status a job. salaries are determined by employers and governments but social status is considered by people in the community.
To wrap it up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons bring us to the conclusion that modern ear's tutors are own less social status rather than past generation's teachers. For, obtaining knowledge was difficult task in the past and because teachers are not the sole source of information for people thanks to the internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...irst and foremost reason which comes to mind to substantiate my opinion is that moder eras teachers ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 565, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...education in the societies and they had more better social status. The second reason that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 370, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Salaries
...ld not present the social status a job. salaries are determined by employers and governm...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, so, thus, while, in fact, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9176201373 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72422722011 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54233409611 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 4.94265232975 344% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9870591685 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.388888889 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2777777778 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24745529882 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074550521675 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767086655188 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137963542295 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577879840238 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.