Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As time changes and technological development, the ways to reach success in a career nowadays are different from the past, even the definition of a successful career is different. Personally, I believe that it is easier to decide a career to meet the public expectation of a successful and stable life in the past. I feel this way for two reasons, which will be explored in the following essay.
To begin with, there were fewer kinds of jobs in the past and most successful people did the same jobs, therefore, it was easy to follow what kinds of jobs can lead a smooth life. For instance, these days, with the development of technology, there are plenty of new areas for me. One time my university held an employment expo and those new fields made me confused that I cannot find out what types of career I should do to have a stable and successful future. In different areas, there are not enough samples to follow, I needed to do some research to understand some new fields I am interested in, such as medical engineering and industrial design, which combine different areas and did not exist in the past. Thus, I do think it was easier to identify what kinds of jobs can lead to a successful life in the past.
Moreover, the points of view of people in the past are simpler than modern people. Besides this, people only had few choices of good careers since most people insisted that wealth and social status are symbols of success, and today everyone has their own new definitions of success. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. As my parents' standard, I should become an engineer since I can earn more money and I can have a higher social status. By contrast, as my definitions, to have a successful future is to get a job I am interested in and to be outstanding in this area. Further, my ambition is to be a war correspondent, while my parents consider that this job will make me live in danger and that being journalist will not make me rich so they do not support me to chase my goal. Hence people in the past had the same opinion of jobs, which lead to an idea future.
In conclusion, no one can deny that it was easy to identify what career or job would guide a secure and successful future for people in the past. This is because there were not many options for perfect jobs and people can find a model easily in the past, also because people had a consensus that wages and status are equal to success and security.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: BE_INTEREST_IN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'interested'?
Suggestion: interested
...arch to understand some new fields I am interesting in, such as medical engineering and ind...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: BE_INTEREST_IN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'interested'?
Suggestion: interested
...ssful future is that finding a job I am interesting in and being outstanding in this area. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 764, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... high status so they do not support me. Hence it would be easy to distinguish which j...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ly in the past, also because people had a condense that wage and status are equal to succe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, as for, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51963048499 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57011611719 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466512702079 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3849708078 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.117647059 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4705882353 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302791895141 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111179569625 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960318684687 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209574246349 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538063408011 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.