Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People holding different
views cannot achieve success as a team.
Since the dawn of civilization, success has had one of the greatest roles in people's lives from around the world. While some people believe that different viewpoints can assist a group to become prosperous, others hold exactly opposite viewpoint. In no way could I agree with the latter point. There are some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, it is undoubted that so important has having various knowledge been that it has had a great number of positive effects on the progression of each group, yet above all it has helped to each group to recognize the weaknesses by investigation all positive and negative aspects of each decision. Additionally, to illustrate this fact, one needs only refer to numerous group which failed due to lack of different points when they encounter with a problem. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better, last time, I was a paper about procedure of making electronic devices, and before selling products, companies give these device to another group to find their bugs, and as result, no one can deny the roles of these two group to progress of that company because they accomplish their tasks against each other. Therefore, not until knowing that did I realize the importance of various views, I do believe that had they not had different view, they could have missed their famous in public easily.
Furthermore, another debatable point is that on the on hand, some people believe that holding different viewpoints give rise conflict among members, yet on the other hand, some people believe that they can provide this opportunity for each other to learn different things which guarantee the success of team. Hence, I strongly agree with the latter point and I do believe that the more people be knowledgeable, the more they would have job security and satisfaction. By way of illustration, the noteworthy intelligible results, which conducted in our country, show that 90 percentage of people who are able to endure different viewpoint, are the ones who do not miss their job which these different viewpoint make the knowledgeable.
To make a long story short, by considering all the aforementioned reasons and many others, one soon realizes that no one can deny the enormous positive effects on having different viewpoint in their group on future of members. Not only are they able to learn many things, but also they can enhance their knowledge. For this reason, were I be determiner in our university, I would have forced students to make groups with students with different views because they are supposed to attend the society in the near future and this program prepare them better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 636, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this device' or 'these devices'?
Suggestion: this device; these devices
...before selling products, companies give these device to another group to find their bugs, an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...hance their knowledge. For this reason, were I be determiner in our university, I wo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01333333333 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69896733796 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.7795717789 48.9658058833 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.142857143 100.406767564 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1428571429 20.6045352989 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11213567191 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483062966226 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444156752574 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833355092752 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551875753068 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 11.7677419355 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.