Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in today s world have become too dependent on automobiles Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
“People in today's world have become too dependent on automobiles.” Use
specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

One of the essential debates among people is automobiles and the dependency of humans on them. Although one group deny this fact, I firmly believe this is a clear fact that in the current time cars have become an inseparable part of humans' life. I will elucidate my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.

Firstly, today's humans are too dependent on automobiles because they make easier time scheduling for people. To be more specific, time-saving is one of the important concerned for everybody. The speed of automobiles, which can arrive at each desirable destination quickly, is an excellent choice for doing every activity in the modern lifestyle. Indeed, cars with this feature play a critical role in the life of all people. Therefore, this role increases the dependency of individuals on automobiles. For instance, in big cities, many people need to adjust their personal plans to arrive at their job based on the speed of cars' movement in highways and the traffic intensity in the ways. As a result, the plan of people for life is too dependent on automobiles.

Secondly, the dependency of individuals on cars is growing because automobiles can prepare a comfortable life for them. From the beginning of history, humans always have tried to find different solutions to make life easier with the innovation of new equipment. Transportation is almost one of the crucial aspects that people want to have improved it, and finally, during the time with the invention of automobiles have achieved this goal. As a result, in the recent century, the life of humans has become very convenient because using cars in the transportation system has increased dramatically. For example, in the past time, the travel even on a small scale was too difficult for peoples, but with automobiles, humans can expand their communication easily. This process has been a positive effect on many aspects of people's lives, such as their marriage, studying, or work in far distances. Therefore, if automobiles did not exist, humans could never have comfortable traveling, so the increasing dependency of individuals on cars in the modern world is an inevitable fact.

In conclusion, the dependency of humans on automobiles is increasing in the recent century. Cars have become an essential need for scheduling time in the personal lives of people. Additionally, automobiles with their comforting have expended the dependency of humans on themselves.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (6 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...eased dramatically. For example, in the past time, the travel even on a small scale was t...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19796954315 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99813988903 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48730964467 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7685805631 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195034799177 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703317072069 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440653970119 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137127721109 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281058303108 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...eased dramatically. For example, in the past time, the travel even on a small scale was t...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19796954315 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99813988903 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48730964467 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7685805631 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195034799177 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703317072069 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440653970119 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137127721109 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281058303108 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.