Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in today’s world have become too dependent on automobiles. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is a heated issue concerning if people rely on automobiles too much after automobiles became common transportation and more available for people. I am of the opinion that it is understandable that people are reliant on vehicles. I feel this way for mainly two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, using cars as transportation is time-saving and convenient because of the high mobility of cars. People can drive anytime they want and choose the shortest routes. In contrast, taking mass transportation, people should wait at certain points and follow the departure time, even they need to face the risk of being delay. My commuting experience is a compelling illustration of this. When I was in high school, I needed to wake up at 6 a.m. to catch my bus to school. It usually took me one hour to my high school, and sometimes there is no available seat. Additionally, it was exhausting for me to stand for one hour on the crowded bus. On the other hand, my father sometimes drove me to school, and it only took me thirty minutes. In this case, I did not need to worry about if I bring too much stuff with me, I certainly could sit down, and I could sleep longer in the morning. Thus, driving a car is actually an efficient way to reach the destination, and people do need it.
Moreover, using private vehicles helps people save money since the public transportation fee is usually higher than the fuel cost when the car drives the same distance. The price passengers pay for public transportation is for keeping the quality of stations, drivers, services, and so on. However, the expense people spend on the fuel of their cars is relatively lower. For instance, when I was in Austria, I and my friends usually shared a car to travel. This is because the tickets for trains and buses are expensive there, even it is faster. If I had used mass transit systems, I would not have spent only 100 euros to travel from Austria to Belgium and to the Netherlands. Hence using automobiles is a cheaper way to move.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that people are dependent on vehicles to a reasonable extent. This is because taking a car is more comfortable and convenient, and we will not spend too much money on transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | Blackcytrus | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | ChiuYuan | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-06 | nusybah | 60 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | zahrash75588 | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | zahrash75588 | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important things people learn are from families 70
- The cane toad is a large 1 8 kg amphibian species native to Central and South America It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers crops by eating harmful insects Unfortunately the toad multiplied 80
- Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons First the inc 88
- Movies and television strongly influence the way people behave Do you agree or disagree Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 88
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 679, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...tria to Belgium and to the Netherlands. Hence using automobiles is a cheaper way to m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6925 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8337596493 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6519358227 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3181818182 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126551767593 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374914118571 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375109725279 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870962977997 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206555326643 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.