Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
In regard to the issue of if bees exist on Earth 200 million years ago. The reading passage points out that there are some skeptics about the argument that bees exist 200 million years ago. Whereas, the writer and the lecturer are apparently sheer contradictory to each other.
Firstly, according to the author, there are no fossils of bees remain before 200 million years, and the earliest preserved body of a bee is 100 million years old. The speaker, however, disclaims the point of view and declares that the reason why people cannot find the fossil of a bee in that period is that the bees were preserved by sticky liquid produced by certain kinds of trees, and such trees became common after that period. Thus, it does not mean the bees did not exist at that time.
Secondly, the reading holds that there is no flowering plant 200 million years ago and modern bees are fed by flowering plants, as the relationship between bees and flowering plants, it is unlikely bees existed at that time. By contrast, the professor disproves the claim of the reading, demonstrating that early bees may be fed by non-flowering plants, and after flowering plans evolved, the bees may adapt them. Therefore, the bees and flowering plants have a new relationship.
Finally, the article asserts that nest chambers made by modern bees and the fossilized structures are similar but different because the fossilized chambers lack the caps that have a spiral pattern. On the other hand, the listening maintains an opposite opinion that there is chemical evidence that support that early bees produced chambers since modern bees protect their nest chambers by using waterproofing substance and the fossilized chambers had the same material that is used by modern bees.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99319727891 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50382649451 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527210884354 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.8359219716 49.2860985944 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.454545455 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 7.06452816374 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.059947722088 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0283487358196 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039454783047 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0421308895122 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318351130051 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.