Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

As the unremitting development of the modern society, the use of internet has been popularized through the efforts that our government have been dedicated. There is no denying that each individual has the right to access internet, but, recently, there is a heated debate regarding whether government should offer internet access to all of their citizens with no cost. From my own perspective, I completely protest this statement, and here are some reasons to consolidate my points of view.

The pay for internet is a great revenue for government. It has been well-acknowledged that people need money to survive, with no exceptions of individual who is paying contributions to the government, and it is rational that people should pay for the internet access which is being provided by the government. Governments can regard the income of internet access as part of their salaries, which can assist each governmental staff to live. Besides, nowadays, with the explosion of the prize of essentials, people need more money in order to make a position which is belonging to themselves in the society, thus paying for the access which is provided by the government is rational and needed. With a foundation of a statistical research conducted by NYU, we can conclude that the revenue of access of internet has been taken 70% of each governmental staff’s entire salary, meaning that the income of internet is of paramount importance for a governmental staff’s living.

If government offer access of internet to the masses with no cost, there will be a high rate of internet crimes. When government provide internet access towards each individual with no costs, the user will go alone with the idea that they can do everything through using the internet, conversely, when government ask masses to purchase the access of using internet, the masses will reckon that since they have paid for the internet, they cannot do anything that violate the laws, for the reason is that as soon as they do something that breaks the laws on the internet, the government will detect their bad behavior at the very first time, and the government will definitely punish the users who has done something improper and ban their right to use the internet. Besides, since the access of internet are supposed to be paid for, the masses will not commit a crime easily, and they will consider every movement when they are using the internet completely, thus preventing crime being committed. In comparison, if the government offer the masses the access of using the internet with no cost, they will do everything they want without considerations. For instance, in my country, the government has released laws that people ought to pay for the access of internet, and as time flies by, the crime rate of internet is decreasing, which endorses the idea of letting the masses pay for the access of internet is effective.

Paying for the access of the internet is necessary, which can bring a series of benefits that everyone can benefit from, and based on my above statements, I exceeding reckon access of internet which is being provided by the government are not supposed to be free.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb belong is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'belongs'
Suggestion: belongs
...money in order to make a position which is belonging to themselves in the society, thus payi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...money in order to make a position which is belonging to themselves in the society, thus payi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...from, and based on my above statements, I exceeding reckon access of internet whi...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, first, if, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.0286738351 227% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2637.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 528.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99431818182 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79557708424 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.397727272727 0.524837075471 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 813.6 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 136.634791786 48.9658058833 279% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 188.357142857 100.406767564 188% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.7142857143 20.6045352989 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367099931995 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164450267177 0.076458572812 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974688363894 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23973716124 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075492528211 0.0645574589148 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 11.7677419355 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 58.1214874552 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.1575268817 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.