Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The reading materials chosen by students on their own is more important than those assigned by their teachers.
It is impossible to go to school without a book for students and their reading materials play important role in their student life. In my opinion, students should decide what kinds of reading materials they would have instead of being asked to read a book. There are some reasons why I feel this way.
First of all, choosing a book or an article is helpful for students since they can explore their interests or even their future careers. Compare to teachers, students know themselves better, they know what kinds of fields attract them the most. Further, letting students choose reading materials gives them more chances to understand their ambition. For instance, a teacher lets all of her students choose the books for writing their reading experience and one of those students who has a high passion in history can choose the book he is interested in. In that, he has more opportunities to inspire his potential abilities and find a goal he wants to reach in the future. Thus, teachers should let students choose the essay or article by themselves.
Moreover, teachers read more literature and are more professional in certain areas indeed. Additionally, letting teachers choose literary works can save students’ time also can make sure the books they read are good. Reading the books assigned by the teacher, however, may waste students’ time as well. Since students will not read the books they are not interested in seriously. My personal experience is a compelling example. Once in a science lecture, the science teacher asked all of the students in the class need to read one of “Science” during the class. Whereas I was not surprised that most of us were not read it seriously, some of them were doing assignments for other courses, some people were even just falling asleep. Therefore, if students are given a book they like, they will read it harder and their skills or ability of thinking will actually be improved by the book.
In conclusion, there are significantly positive influences for letting students decide the reading materials for themselves. Because students can have more chances to explore themselves and develop their performance in the fields they like.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to read'.
Suggestion: to read
... most. Further, letting students choose reading materials gives them more chances to un...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ever, may waste students’ time as well. Since students will not read the books they a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ence lecture, the science teacher asked all of the students in the class need to read one ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03296703297 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65091527007 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4095152108 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4210526316 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1578947368 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28458357629 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102868326302 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694529268149 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201503296253 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253237409437 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.