Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Rules are meant to be broken. There is no shortage of opinions on whether rules are really too strict for young people to follow. I completely agree that rules are strict for young people to follow. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the current world cannot adjust to the earlier lifestyle. People’s mindset has changed due to the technological and social changes. For instance, when my grandparents were young, women were not allowed to work outside home. Nowadays, people encourage women to pursue their career and live a fulfilling life. As a result, some people think that rules are being broken. In reality, these rules cannot be followed in current times.
Furthermore, young people love to broaden their mindsets. They prefer doing every possible thing. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I remember when I asked my parents that I want to go out late due to college work, they were hesitant to permit me to go. They had preconceived notions that people should not roam around at night, especially girls. I insisted on going and eventually they allowed me.
To sum up, young people should not be told to follow these rules. This is because current lifestyle cannot incorporate such rules and because young people do not like to be confined in a certain way. Change is inevitable so rules should also not be constant. Instead, rules should change according to the changing conditions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, really, so, for instance, i feel, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 250.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.916 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54649248968 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7557569062 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.45 100.406767564 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.5 20.6045352989 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244911925536 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797560690374 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823857734149 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156314929471 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919291473619 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.