Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Scientists should be
responsible for the negative impacts of their discoveries.
Since the dawn of civilization, discoveries have had one of the greatest roles in people's lives from all over the world, for they have had one of the most permanent influence changes in our lives. While some people believe that scientists should not be responsible for the negative effects of their discoveries, other hold exactly opposite view. In no way could I agree with the latter viewpoint. There are some reasons, the most important of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, it is undoubted that people should learn how to use something due to the fact that it is an obligatory task for government to teach people how to use new discovery. Additionally, I am certain that most scientists want to assist mankind by their discoveries. Parents and governments should put their all effort to show the good benefits of new things. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. Last time, I was reading a magazine in the field of energy. The narrator had said that scientists have discovered the nuclear energy with the purpose of eliminating fossil fuel, but some governments had used it against another nation in wars. I do believe that had the scientists known that the intention of the government, they would not have discovered nuclear energy.
The second debatable point is that, on the one hand, some people believe that scientists should not discover new thins which people can manipulate them toward each other or environment, yet some people believe that we should notice the number of advantages are more important due to the fact that all of people besides governments are responsible for limitation of negative effects of them. Hence, I do agree with the latter point and I do believe that the more people prevent the negative effects, the more we are able to great world. By way of illustration, cars and others vehicle had made with the purpose of facilitating people's lives and transfer them easily to get their destination, but people are using the fossil fuel much and these much consuming are a big threat for ozone layer. As a result, people and government are important responsible for the new discoveries.
To make a long story short, by considering of all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that no one can deny the enormous effects of scientists on our lives. Not only are they not responsible for negative effects of discoveries, but also they people should respect them because they are trying to make people's lives convenient. For this reason, were I be a determiner in our country, I would have enacted a strict roles for people using the negative effects of new discoveries toward environment or others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 353, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ples lives convenient. For this reason, were I be a determiner in our country, I wou...
^^^^
Line 4, column 422, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'role'?
Suggestion: role
... country, I would have enacted a strict roles for people using the negative effects o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, second, so, while, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93156732892 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75794753007 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454746136865 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.2172397652 48.9658058833 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.111111111 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220633662816 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804358027281 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576859107134 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152669540718 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176584679791 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.