Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and

Essay topics:

Question:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, the internet plays a major role in individuals' lives in a wide variety of aspects. In my opinion, governments should provide free internet access for all of their citizens because not only can it improves their knowledge but also it saves people's time as well. The following paragraphs will aptly elucidate my perspective.
To begin with, there is a great deal of valuable information on the internet which people can have access to them in order to increase their knowledge and expand their horizon. So beneficial is this information that it will change people's lives positively; therefore, governments should offer free internet access. From a graduate student point of view, free internet enables the student to search on the internet in order to find numerous articles and books which help them to do their research well. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. When I was at university, I had free access to the internet, for I did my research without any kinds of problems. Then, because of COVID-19 pandemic, our university has been closed until further notice, for this, since I cannot afford to buy internet, and our government did not offer use the free internet, I cannot do my research. As a result, if our government provided us internet with no cost, I would do my assignment without any problem.
Furthermore, It is established beyond doubt that one the one hand, some people believe that if government offer free internet to people, their time will be wasted by spending on the internet, yet on the other hand, some people believe that not only their time is not wasted, but also they can save their time. I take the former viewpoint with a grain of salt and agree with the latter viewpoint, for if believe that the more people have access to the free internet, the more they stay at home to do their personal things using the internet without going out. As a matter of fact, if they go out to do their tasks, they have to spend most of their time in traffic, which will cause air pollution if they use their own car in the worse situation.
To wrap it up, based on what mentioned above, one soon realizes that offering free internet bring several lucrative consequences for both governments and individuals inasmuch as in the first place, people's knowledge will be increased, as in the second place, people can save their time by staying at home

Votes
Average: 7.1 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.799031477 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57857540459 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1323119027 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.571428571 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7142857143 5.45110844103 252% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31173004227 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121358723751 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674100187509 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191957057608 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695055566834 0.0645574589148 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.799031477 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57857540459 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1323119027 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.571428571 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7142857143 5.45110844103 252% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31173004227 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121358723751 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674100187509 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191957057608 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695055566834 0.0645574589148 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.