Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better to be dishonest with people than to always tell them the truth. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Maintaining healthy relationships could be difficult in today's world. There are many aspects in our interactions with others that we need to worry about. In my opinion, we should not always tell the truth especially with the people we care about the most. I feel this way for two reasons that I will explore in the following passage.
Firstly, sometimes telling small lies can motivate people who have the potential but need motivation. People are competitive by nature and would feel motivated if they believe they could excel at a task they have been assigned. So, telling a minute lie to enhance their attitude towards the task would reflect on their productivity and they would even show impressive results. Take my own compelling experience as an example. My husband signed up for a marathon race held in our city. When he asked for my opinion, I lied and said he will be one of the top ten. Accordingly, this inspired him and he devoted all his time and energy to practice. Although he did not make it to the top ten, he appreciated my support and came out of the experience healthier and more athletic. If I told him the truth from the start, he would have lost interest and won't have adopted this new healthy lifestyle. Obviously, being dishonest occasionally with good intentions is essential for our relationships with our beloved people and their progress.
On the other hand, telling the truth on some occasions causes high levels of anxiety. Because when you reveal the truth, there might be some unpleasant consequences. Eventually, this will affect your peace of mind. For instance, my colleague asked me how I feel about her new haircut and actually, I did not like it so told her the plain truth. However, she didn't express any anger from my remarks but I knew she got sad. Eventually, I was so stressed all day and was skeptical if I jeopardized our friendship by emphasizing the truth about her haircut. As you see, being dishonest would have saved me from this stress and kept my relationship with my colleague healthy and unaffected.
In essence, being honest or dishonest depends much on the situation at hand. However, some dishonesty is mandatory to keep good relationships with people we interact with every day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... need to worry about. In my opinion, we shouldnt always tell the truth especially with t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will explore in the following passage. Firstly, sometimes telling small lies ca...
^^^
Line 2, column 658, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ime and energy to practice. Although he didnt make it to the top ten, he appreciated ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 846, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... start, he would have lost interest and wouldnt have adopted this new healthy lifestyle...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...l about her new haircut and actually, I didnt like it so told her the plain truth. Ho...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... told her the plain truth. However, she didnt express any anger from my remarks but I...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, for instance, i feel, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85863874346 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73458359256 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568062827225 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1599461156 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.6956521739 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6086956522 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198631183573 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563667277395 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524523410098 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13826030355 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295409216045 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.