Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. The group will be helped more by a person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
To help students develop cooperation awareness, professors today are more likely to let students finish group projects together. Some people contend that members insisting on their own ways to do things are more helpful to the group than people who are willing to do what others want. However, personally speaking, people who are willing to carry out the thoughts of other group members are more beneficial to a group, as it helps the group save up much time and contributes to the relationships among group members.
Without doubt, cooperative members can greatly increase the efficiency. Specifically, such members are willing to spend time in carrying out the thoughts and plans of the whole group and make the group more practical, which will definitely help the group save up time. For example, I was once assigned to work with roommates on a biological experiment that is quite complicated and time-consuming. After brief discussion, we came up with a primitive plan. Without hesitation, one of my roommate started working on it. Greatly encouraged by his behavior, all of us get engaged in the experiment. Finally, we become the only group that finished the assignment on time, as other groups spend too much time in arguing about the ways to do the experiment. Without my roommate's willingness to cooperate, never would my group receive positive remarks from our professor.
Also, such people contributes to the relationship among group members. A group member who is willing to work on others' thoughts can sometimes stop the endless arguments and create friendly atmosphere. Take myself as an example, there was a time when I was assigned to work in a group which composed of students from different grades. At the beginning, several senior students insisted on their thoughts, thinking they were more experienced. Caring little about their arguments, I started to doing researches on the thoughts of majority. Soon later, seeing what I was doing, all other group members stopped the meaningless argument and started to communicate more friendly about the specific steps to carry out the plan. If I had not been so cooperative, such friendly atmosphere would not have come up.
It has been argued that a person preferring to do things in a different way can benefit the group, as independent thinking might bring about surprising result. Some group members may have unique ideas which cannot be understood by others until they are carried out. However, such independence can lead to a tight relationship among group members, which is definitely harmful to the cooperation.
In summary, it is sometimes true that people doing things in ways different from other group members can benefit the group. However, after discussion, I still think group members willing to working on others' thoughts are more helpful to the group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 58, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d that a person preferring to do things in a different way can benefit the group, as independent t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, still, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.170995671 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79705023231 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2906386542 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.869565217 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0869565217 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13043478261 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449580869149 0.236089414692 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131630172841 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115581071327 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29277648259 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101167234334 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.