Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. U

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In recent times, there has been a widespread debate on either universities or kids education is more important for successful of the country. While some people believe that spending money on university is more significant, I hold the opposite view. I think that governments have to fund children education process in order to succeed in future.
To begin with, when children have perfect education system, they can develop the country in the future. Weak kid’s education system might lead to huge consequences for most countries. For example, in my hometown Saudi Arabia, children’s schools do not have any governmental support, so most kids do not have enough knowledge that allow them to develop the country. Now, the government realized that most of their citizens do not have the ability to build factories or invent any technological devices. Therefore, the government spent more than billion dollars to hire American specialists who can come up with creative ideas to develop the country. Imagine the government spend this tremendous amount of money on children’s educational process by sending these kids abroad to learn or building effective schools, these children will improve their mentality and their way of thinking. Thus, they can invent many impressive ideas in the country that lead to huge flourishment.
In addition to developing the country in the future, spending money on children education is more durable. Whenever government spend money on something, it needs that money to come back. As a result, kids by their perfect knowledge, they will work in the country for long time because they are citizens. They can make many developments in the country among all these working years. For example, the government of the UAE invested a lot of money on kid’s education. Therefore, by the year of 2010, these kids became an adult. They built many towers and factories that improved the economical status for the country. These kids will work for several years, so the country can get many benefits for long time.
In conclusion, we should encourage governments to spend money on kid’s education rather than universities.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n education process in order to succeed in future. To begin with, when children have p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... process in order to succeed in future. To begin with, when children have perfec...
^^^
Line 2, column 555, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...erefore, the government spent more than billion dollars to hire American specialists wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... towers and factories that improved the economical status for the country. These kids will...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25722543353 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85441023508 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517341040462 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3384115071 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7368421053 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2105263158 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34458950471 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117633984282 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074708423502 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239338494114 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013256811426 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.