Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
In today's sophisticated and progressive world, in which we live, governors face a plethora choice which employing each of them can turn the county into a burgeon nation or devastate all dedicated time and efforts. In this line of thought, so many people believe that dedicating time and money to children's education would be more beneficial for the country rather than Spending money to equip universities. Others, on the contrary, stand on the other side of the continuum. I, personally, concur with the former notion because of the two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, all community members will not continue their education until the university. To be more specific, with the genesis of the technology a wide variety of job opportunity is provided for individuals which some of them do not need higher education. In other words, a high proportion of the people do not go to higher education centers, and dedicating budgets just for universities will not cover all society. On the contrary, by spending money on children education managers can help all community members together by working on human features which are the base of any progress in all nations.
Secondly, spending time and money on very young children will assist decision-makers to work on personal characteristics and education issues together. To clarify more, individuals who are in universities are ones which their personality has taken shape, and dedicating money to university managers only provide the facility for them and cannot work on the personality features of a student. In fact, in order to have a prosperous country, it would be more beneficial to work on the characteristic such as hard wording, humanism, and sympathy, which teaching these lessons to very young children would be more effective. Therefore, it is hoped that decision-makers spend money on the education of very young age kids.
Lastly, some people, on the other hand, might say dedicating money to universities will be beneficial because through having knowledge, the country will progress suddenly. At first glance, this claim may sound completely true, but my answer to these people is that there are nations which by their knowledge cannot live a good life together. For example, in my country, in spite of the reasonable progress in universities and educational centers, people do not care about each other, if they see a poor individual in the street they would not help she/he because they are not familiar with the concept of humanism and sympathy.
All in all, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons bring us to the conclusion that it is better to support financially very young kids rather than in university age. For, manager can work on educational and personal features together during young ages education and because all individuals are not intended to pursue their study at university.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...g each of them can turn the county into a burgeon nation or devastate all dedicated time ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kids rather than in university age. For, manager can work on educational and pers...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in fact, such as, in other words, in spite of, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2446.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17124735729 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94069014879 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492600422833 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 18.0 4.94265232975 364% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2985324752 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.882352941 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8235294118 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280126943285 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996275692377 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750981273017 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165401244199 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055737654976 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...g each of them can turn the county into a burgeon nation or devastate all dedicated time ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kids rather than in university age. For, manager can work on educational and pers...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in fact, such as, in other words, in spite of, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2446.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17124735729 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94069014879 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492600422833 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 18.0 4.94265232975 364% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2985324752 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.882352941 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8235294118 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280126943285 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996275692377 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750981273017 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165401244199 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055737654976 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.