do you agree or disagree with the following statement? teacher were more appreciated by society in the past than they were nowadays.
In every society, teachers have a significant influence not only on the future of the students, but also on the future of the country. Therefore, every society should be grateful of their efforts. There is an argument between different groups of people that teachers were more appreciated by society in the past or they are more valued today. I strongly refute the presented claim for a couple of reason.
Firstly, it seems that today, teachers are more cherished by society and there are more facilities, which are devoted to the teacher. The ministry of education of my country, Iran, in recent decade, has considered many advantages for young teacher in my country. After they start to teach at the schools, they can be settled in the houses that are prepared for whom have not a house for themselves with a low rent. Also the teacher weekly can use from the facilities such as swimming pool for free. As a result, it seems that the teachers are more valued by society in the years.
Moreover, in my country, Iran, there are a great respect for the teachers. People are familiar with effect that they can have on their children. Therefore, they treat to the teachers as important part of the society. In past they most of the teachers im my town, after retirement for paying their cost of living, usually would bought a taxi and work as a taxi driver. But in recent years, in our parliament, a law was approved, which upon on it the retirement salary of teacher have increased increasingly. As a result it seems that today, the teachers are more valued by society.
To sum ut, because in recent decade there are considered many facilities for teachers and also their retirement salary has increased, the teachers are more appreciated by today's society. Because the teachers have a great influence on the future of the country, it seems that in future they will be have great position between people in every country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...a house for themselves with a low rent. Also the teacher weekly can use from the fac...
^^^^
Line 9, column 314, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put between 'would' and 'bought'.
Suggestion: would usually bought
...rement for paying their cost of living, usually would bought a taxi and work as a taxi driver. But i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'buy'
Suggestion: buy
...ing their cost of living, usually would bought a taxi and work as a taxi driver. But i...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt, a law was approved, which upon on it the retirement salary of teacher have in...
^^
Line 9, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he teachers are more valued by society. To sum ut, because in recent decade ther...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...d, the teachers are more appreciated by todays society. Because the teachers have a gr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80239520958 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54794641 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 212.727598566 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434131736527 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2948475675 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3529411765 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222122213388 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083731494774 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793212928311 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156205238997 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428289217821 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.