Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers had a greater influence on young people in the past than they do today.
The school is an academic center, the main responsibility of which is to prepare students for having both a successful profession and personal life. In fact, the school helps students learn how to decide their path and make a progress day in day out. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether nowadays teachers have the profound impact on students than past. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that today with the advent of sophisticated technologies, hardly students influenced by their teachers. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, teachers play a consequential role in any given society owing to the fact that they are the pillars of the society and the success of a nation largely depends on its teachers. Generally phrased, before the invention of a wide variety of technologies students were more dependents on their teachers and listened to their words carefully and meticulously. But in today's hectic city of life, students are leading an independent education. As a palpable example, various education packages provide an opportunity for students to keep track of their education without any teacher. So, in this situation, teachers could not have any direct influence on students. To elucidate more on this issue, in the past teachers were like a hero or role model that myriads of students admired them but now rarely students value their teachers.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that teachers in the past encouraged students to study hard in order to reach a higher education and make a progress day in day out. If we take a minute to ponder over it, students knew how their teachers could change their lives drastically and helped them become a self-sufficient person. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that students are now careful about their study and they always opt for careers with less level of complication like plumber, carpenter and so forth. With this attitude, students will not be able to realize the importance of teachers in their personal lives.
However, every coin has two sides. Vast majorities of students in the past had to work along with their study. So, they had not enough time and energy to continue their education. Indeed, they could not afford to enroll in good schools and hired teachers to improve their education, so, hardly could they influenced by their teachers. But now, students just stay focus on their education and they are more likely to understand the value of their teachers. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether nowadays teachers have the profound imp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, as to, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98357289528 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73415236168 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517453798768 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4322637122 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.318181818 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1363636364 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.09090909091 5.45110844103 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126438363108 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447439198312 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368698792309 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718452476076 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389776849856 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.