Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Sometimes it is hard to avoid the topics related to society or politics for teachers during the class, and some of the students certainly are curious about their teachers' opinions. In my opinion, teachers should not mention their own ideas especially talk about it in an emotional way, they should be objective. There are two reasons why I feel this way, which I will explore in the following essay.

First and foremost, it will be a good chance for students to think about social or political issues on their own. It can help them to train their thinking ability and judgment. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. While my society teacher was explaining how the election works, one of my classmates asked her who she would vote in the next presidential election. After a short awkward moment, she started introducing the three candidates, the policies they announced, their backgrounds, and the parties they belong to. After finishing the introduction, she asked the student who he wants to vote. For me, it was an impressive class since I also tried to think about who I would like to support. In short, it is important to give the students opportunities to think and have their own ideas instead of giving the answer, especially sometimes there is no correct answer.

Moreover, teachers should not express their views on sensitive issues. In that, some students do not have sound judgment, they may be impacted by others' opinions. Consider the issue of abolishing the death penalty, for instance. People hold different ideas for ethical and personal reasons. If a teacher harangue about the issue subjectively, the students who have never thought about this topic may agree with him or even believe he is right. Therefore, teachers should not try to control students' minds.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that teachers should avoid talking about their point of view about some certain social or political events. This is because they should help students to cultivate their own values and thinking abilities. Additionally, teachers should not express their personal thoughts and emotions to their students since they may cause some negative effects to the students.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2022-10-23	HSNDEK	73	view
2022-10-23	HSNDEK	73	view
2022-07-19	Hello GRE	60	view
2022-07-01	sarasabzi	70	view
2022-06-12	nida fatima	73	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user Lindsey0101 :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...tics for teachers during the class, and some of the students certainly are curious about th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an emotional way" with adverb for "emotional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...heir own ideas especially talk about it in an emotional way, they should be objective. There are tw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, as for, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in short, talking about, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1108033241 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66703911836 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534626038781 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7174409805 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.25 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238686851881 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762461581097 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549516318982 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165059817901 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337711087342 0.0645574589148 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.