Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of allowing teachers to discuss their own social and political views with the students. Although some people believe that teachers should not make their social or political views known to the students, I think that teachers must open up their views on political or social activities to their students and I will address in detail in the subsequents paragraphs.
First and foremost, teachers should help their students to be a responsible human being. Apart from discussing the textbook contents, teachers also discuss the social or the political matters, students will be to know what is happening around themselves in their country. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by my own experience. You see, while in the first year of my college, our economic teacher, Ratan sir, used to discuss social activities everyday before starting the class. Many students including me used to wait for this moment, as we not only get to know about the social activities led by some organizations like different NGOS at our locality, we used to participate in the discussion too. Therefore, this eventually encouraged us to engage ourselves with a NGO, named Kalyan to teach the needy students in different places including Sundarban, the southeast part of the west bengal. For this reason, if our teacher never informed us about the social activities, we would have never been able to devote ourselves to such a great activity like teaching poor students.
Secondly, discussing social or political activities also plays a great role in improving the interpersonal skill of the students. Since the students find a common topic to discuss with their teacher, it helps them to be more open to their teacher. Most importantly, this helps them to improve their communication skill by letting them express their views. Drawing from my own experience, my brother used to be very shy in his school days, but he was very sound about politics. I remember when their new history teacher joined, his communication skill changed dramatically. He used to discuss the political events, on which he is interested, with his teacher regularly in the classroom. As a result, he conquered this problem and improved his communication skill to a great extent. And now my brother is an eminent economist.
In the light of the above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that teachers should talk about the social or the political activities in the classroom. This is because it helps students to broaden their knowledge about the activities happening around them and improve their communication skill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of al...
^^
Line 4, column 482, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... sir, used to discuss social activities everyday before starting the class. Many student...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 805, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... encouraged us to engage ourselves with a NGO, named Kalyan to teach the needy st...
^
Line 6, column 826, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...now my brother is an eminent economist. In the light of the above mentioned reas...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd improve their communication skill.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, i think, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09954751131 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80683806432 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488687782805 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6526001129 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.7 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27981799128 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898220287385 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772021895826 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199081706009 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703682898852 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.