Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
It goes without saying in today’s progreesive world where we live, most of the people are exploring in various topics and each individual has special opinions. Morever, all of the people share their ideas in their relationship and are influenced by each other. There is a debate among psychologists that, every person can affect on other’s opinion who they have communicated more. Therefore, the most community that students are involved more are school and teachers. I hold the view that, teachers should not aware the students with personal views about social and political topics. The reasons to support my idea are illustrated in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, there is no secret to anyone that, most students spend a lot time at school and they have conversation more with the teachers about everythings. Therefore, they rely on the teacher’s opinion and are influenced by them. As a result, students follow their teachers and this can prevent them to think independantley. In this way, each person does not learn how to think about the different topics with his point of view. For instance, when I was at high school, I was really close to one of my teachers. She used to make her opinion about social issues such as the life of addicts. Unfortunately, she looked at them as a criminal person and belived that they had punished. So, I had persued her opinion and attended in some public community which demand for legal punishing addict people. Nowadays, I can think carefully and know that, I was wrong in the past and I had not affected my teacher’s view because the addict people are not guilty and should cure to obtain their healthy mentality.
Furthermore, sometimes the teachers convey their special ideas in order to prevent to say reality so it makes the students unfamiliar about the whole aspect of topics and can not find out the truth. Cosequentley, unconsionsly they will become as a person who do not realize the inside fact of every person and others can trust on the opinion in future.
In conclusion, having considered the above-mentioned reasons into account, I firmly believe that, teachers should not reveal their opinion for students because it has a negative effect and make the obstacle to think independently and know the whole truth about every matter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...dividual has special opinions. Morever, all of the people share their ideas in their relat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ng psychologists that, every person can affect on other’s opinion who they have communica...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...son and others can trust on the opinion in future. In conclusion, having considered the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, really, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96640826873 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72411968813 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514211886305 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3804479395 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2115488776 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711472370873 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682587624637 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133615692456 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344822248209 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.