Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid at least as much as doctors, lawyers or business leaders.
Teachers nourish and germinate the future germs of a country. Some people argue that they should be paid as least the level that could be compared with doctors, lawyers or business leaders due to their great social contributions. In my point of view, this statement is true for the following reasons.
First of all, teachers don’t get what they deserved for their input and effort. Teachers often sacrifice their spare time to solve student’s questions, especially when students are preparing for the Gao Kao, working the same hour as the business leader do.Professors also need to grasp the latest cut-edge knowledge and do a lot of research in the laboratory, just the way the doctors do. They have to be creative and adjust their teacher methods according to their students every time, requiring the same level of intelligence and adaptability. Teachers devote the same level of time, abilities, and efforts as doctors, lawyers, and business leader. It is quite unfair for them to receive such a small amount of wages.
In addition, teachers don’t get what they deserved payment for their output and contribution. Teachers are responsible for imparting their precious and profound knowledge to their students, who promisingly will become such doctors to cure diseases for patients, such lawyers to protect innocent citizens from crimes, and such business leaders to generate benefits and foster the economy of a country. Without their profound and knowledgeable teachers/mentors, will they be competent, and therefore, capable of receiving those high salaries? The answer might be no. Hence, teachers should be valued appropriated and correspondingly.
Furthermore, the payment increment can boost the educational development. Giving teachers more money plays as an incentive for them to devote their hearts and souls and motivate them to give better classes and be more patient with students. It also relieves their financial burden, allowing teachers to be more concentrate on improving overall academic performance. Plus, high salary will attract more people to join the profession. With more competition, the best people would be the ones who are ultimately hired. Better teachers contribute to the development of the whole educational industry. In this case, more students will be well-prepared when they graduation and benefit the whole country as well.
Admittedly, it is not practical to raise all teachers' salary indiscriminately and it is necessary to maintain some difference due to the personal factors. However, it is important to raise the average salary to at least the same level of doctors, lawyers, and businessman because of teachers' great input and output as well as the positive influence on education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the following reasons. First of all, teachers don't get what they deserv...
^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Professors
...the same hour as the business leader do.Professors also need to grasp the latest cut-edge ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e whole country as well. Admittedly, it is not practical to raise all teacher...
^^
Line 9, column 47, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...edly, it is not practical to raise all teachers salary indiscriminately and it is neces...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, at least, in addition, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41958041958 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97671826985 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526806526807 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.120527694 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.681818182 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40909090909 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237900764202 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704296814954 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603870312364 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148301526222 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077744672052 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.