Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, because of Internet and a variation of media, each person has his or her own political and social view by interpretation them. This view can impact on people's lives, significantly. So, it should be considered as an essential matter in society. Many people believe that teachers should tell their opinions on social and political objects, on the other hand, others, totally disagree with this. I believe that schools are a good place for these kinds of discussions because students spend a lot of time in them. So, I think teachers should be allowed to say their opinion freely in the classes due to two main reasons which I provide under here.
First of all, teachers are high-educated people who have an open mind and usually consider all the aspects of something which they say in the class. Also, they have enough knowledge to debate about political and social issues and answer all the student' questions in these fields. For example, I remember when I was in high school, we had a history teacher who had a lot of knowledge about political and social issues of our country. He had spent much time studying these fields and always was saying his opinion about these issues include each possible sides of the view. He encouraged students to have more study about social and political matters and to ask their political and social questions through the class. I believe that our teacher played a significant role in the stating student's views and he helped them to know matters unprejudiced. As you can see, teachers can assist students to have a better view on political and social issues.
Second, I think, the first and foremost reliable source for students to know political and social issues are teachers because students know their teachers for a long time and trust them a lot. As you know, there are a variety of other sources which can easily affect students who have not guidance. Many of these sources such as media like TV shows, paid by some political sides to advertise them and because students have not enough knowledge to distinguish between biased and unbiased contents, usually they would be deceived by them. It is where the role of teachers turns out because they are people whom students can trust them. For example, when I was young, I always watched TV programs which were about political and social topics. Sometimes I felt that I was confused by these programs because they were on the contrast with each other. I always was asking questions in my classes because I thought my teachers were more reliable than TV programs. They usually addressed my problems with these issues and helped me to figure out sophisticated political and social issues. As a result, I believe that because students trust their teachers, so they would ask them for help in these essential matters.
In sum, students are in the certain age range, they have a lot of question about political and social views and it seems because teachers are honest to students and have enough knowledge in these fields, they can help students to construct their own opinion on these areas. So, governments and people should encourage teachers to talk about these issues with students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as media 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...ce. Many of these sources such as media like TV shows, paid by some political sides ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 848, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
...were on the contrast with each other. I always was asking questions in my classes because ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, for example, i think, such as, you know, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2643.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 543.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86740331492 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4787173761 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41620626151 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 807.3 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.288931639 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226125788217 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820602010863 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530344178372 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170354354076 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245796338107 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.