Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, work is an important part of each person's life. People spend most of their time working. Many of them believe that they should do their works quickly and take risks, on the contrary, others think that they should focus on their work and do it slowly and correctly. In my view, it is better to do a task as well as possible and we should not be concerned about the time which is spending on it. I provided two reasons here.
First, the quality of work and final products is so important, as you know, there are a lot of tasks we should do each day as an employee and I believe that it is better to do one work correctly rather than do some work incorrectly. For example, I remember when I was working as a trainee for a company two years ago, I spend a lot of time for doing one task as well as possible, I worked hard for it. Although, other people who were in the internship, were trying to do more than one task to prove their abilities and show them to the bosses. At the end of the internship, when they wanted to choose the best trainee, they just found one excellent work and it was mine, so, they just hired me. As you can see, for many corporations, the quality of works is more important than the number of it and the speed of doing tasks.
Second, these days with hectic and stressful lives that people have, they need to have some relaxation to do their best. Doing works fast could cause more stresses for them, so they cannot focus on their tasks and probably would make some mistakes which can bring dire consequences. For example, my brother worked for a company when he was young. The owner of the company assigned a lot of tasks to each person in all days. After a while, because the pressure of tasks was so high, my brother made a horrible mistake which causes to destroy one of the important equipment of the company. In the result, they fired him, without reforming their policy. After a while, I heard the same accident happened in that company again, that showed the policy of them was wrong. So, as you can see, corporations and factories should consider some time for their employees to relax and ask them a few tasks each day. Hiring new employees could compensate them for reducing the production due to doing a few tasks by each person.
In sum, doing works fast can bring some unintended consequences for companies, because each person has limited abilities and cannot do a lot of tasks in one day, also, the quality of products is important for companies. In the result, doing works slowly and correctly is the best choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...days, work is an important part of each persons life. People spend most of their time w...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'destroying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: destroying
...er made a horrible mistake which causes to destroy one of the important equipment of the c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, well, while, for example, you know, as well as, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2096.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43128964059 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34758759764 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441860465116 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.874294607 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8095238095 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5238095238 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191308779114 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686776143159 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643306347067 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139716333936 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358176136742 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.