Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The kind of people's thought is a very imortant part of intelligence society. individuals according to their thought, forming from school, judge different social and plolitical issues and determine who take on managing country or province like presidence, mayor, and so forth. Some people believe that the classroom is the best place to students be familired with social and political by teacher's presonality view, however others hold the oppositie view. In my opinion, students should not be known thought of teachers about political and social matters for two noticeable reasons.
The main reason is that teacher's own thought about various issues such as political and social can cause students to decide biasly. pupils have susceptive thought that form from schools to adulthood. unfortunately, majority of pupils accept only the views of kind individuals like their teachers who spend more time and involve with them closely. if teachers unadvertantly give their thought about issues that occure in society, it can change the thought of students severely. For example, when I was in high school, my math teacher, who was in faver of radical candidate for precidency, tolk about about election all the time. In the middle of semister, presidency election would be start, and I could take part in poll for the first time for the first time. however, I did not know which cadidate who take on administaring my country for 4 years is the best chose. Sadly, I elected radical cadidate, who limited the budget of education while allocated more money to reinforce army, according to my teacher's view. if my teacher never had made known me with his views about election, I vote for radical condidate.
The another reason is that teacher who give its thought about special subject like political and social can badly change the way of country. In developing countries, societies have a lot of limitation to prevent of spreading bad though of people like such as perverse teachers. These teachers have great influnce on change the kind of view individuals like students who impact on family's thought. Graually, with informed people can redirect the way of countries. For instance, when my father was elemantary school, revolution took place in countries after about 10 years. At first, government tried to restrict everyone that wanted to arouse society, especially teachers, in order to smother disagreements. Moreover, they ceased the activity of schools to disconnet relation between students and teachers. however, teachers hold calss in the mountation to convey their view to students. Therefore, stuedens and society be decievied by teacher disagreed with government, and unfortunately revolution took place ultimatily. As you can see, the view of teacher that teach in calssroom can have reverse effects on society.
In conclusion, the view of teachers can impact on student's thought directly. Not only does it cause students to think about polling partianly, but also change the way of country. teachers should no give their view in the classroom in order not to influnce on society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Individuals
... imortant part of intelligence society. individuals according to their thought, forming fro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Pupils
...al can cause students to decide biasly. pupils have susceptive thought that form from ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unfortunately
...ht that form from schools to adulthood. unfortunately, majority of pupils accept only the vie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ore time and involve with them closely. if teachers unadvertantly give their thoug...
^^
Line 7, column 594, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: about
... radical candidate for precidency, tolk about about election all the time. In the middle of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 761, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... for the first time for the first time. however, I did not know which cadidate who take...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1016, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ce army, according to my teachers view. if my teacher never had made known me with...
^^
Line 11, column 807, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...relation between students and teachers. however, teachers hold calss in the mountation ...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Teachers
...ly, but also change the way of country. teachers should no give their view in the classr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2606.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24346076459 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71588192658 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490945674044 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 788.4 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5023440211 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.230769231 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1153846154 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42307692308 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221694217049 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725850168023 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064954483008 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169302009079 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320915552812 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.