Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
It is in no argue that teachers have a pivotal effect on individuals futures. The more hard-working and knowledgeable the teachers are, the more influences have they on children. Personally, I believe that tutors are not appreciated much as they used to in past. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.
First of all, Teaching is not presume a hard job nowadays anymore. In the past, before the advent of the internet and easy access to the vast information inside it, students had to rely mainly on their teachers. However, in modern life it is such a simple task to find data just by clicking and surfing the net; Moreover the social media make such access even easier, youth people are the professions of these type of applications, they can share information rapidly; as a result, their concept is that learning knowledge is not such big deal, so the teachers' task won't be difficult. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. By the time when I was studying at university, the prevalence of internet usage had already entered my home, so I was very aware of how to google the articles needed for my field of study. On the other hand, one of my professor was behaving very old fashioned and not very accustomed to technology advances. So as a simple student, I was raising some new questions during classes, and the professor was not able to provide ample reasons. So, other students though he is not very thoughtful as his position offered to be.
Secondly, youths tases had changed drastically over this new decade. Students less care about educations, and they prefer to have more fun rather than study the tedious school courses, to them uneducated prominent celebrities are the real role models to pursue. Without knowing what really is behind the fancy curtain, they assume stars job are nothing to do with educating. Consequently, the teacher's job loss it's vital to children.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that mentors do not consider and behave well as they should be. This is because of intruding advanced technology and unstable taste of humankind altogether.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explain in the following essay. First of all, Teaching is not persume a ...
^^^
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...ot persume a hard job nowadays anymore. In past, before the advant of internet and easy...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 207, Rule ID: HOW_EVER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'however'?
Suggestion: However
...s had to rely mainly on their teachers. How ever in modern life it is such a simple task...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oughfull as his position offerd to be. Secondly, youth tases has changed drasti...
^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...s job are nothing to do with educating. Consequently the teachers job loss its importans to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, well, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76630434783 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64318237045 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.7085162023 48.9658058833 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.176470588 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119296863154 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334831532135 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456065303158 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818061932524 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046173717619 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.