Do you agree or disagree? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
There are differing opinions on whether teachers were more appreciated and valued by society than they were nowadays.
Some people think that they are more appreciated today, for they believe that teachers have stood in the upper class of society in some countries and so they should be appreciated.
Others, however, argue that they were more respectable and appreciated in the past and they played a significant role in the past for educated communities.
In my view, I strongly believe that teachers were more appreciated in the past and their role has been faded away nowadays for two compelling reasons.
To begin with, in the past time, people had rare access to scientific sources. So they were more dependent on the teachers in the areas of science and knowledge. So they thought, indeed, teachers are profound resources of knowledge. On the other hand, knowing and science was counted a merit and so teachers were impressive and respectable persons.
For instance, in our country Iran, it was a costume that a teacher was prominent in various fields of science as astronomy, natural science, mathematics and so on. Remarkably, People appreciated them so much only because of their knowings.
Furthermore, teachers played more roles in the students' life career. They involved in miscellaneous issues of the student and they tried to give some of the helps them. So they were effective persons for students, in general.
For example, My father remembers how his teacher helped him to make some money when my father got into trouble in a period of time. He says he always consulted with his teacher in particular conditions. So his teacher was an impressive person like a hero in my father's life.
In sum, some may oppose that people had a specific view of point to teachers. Not only were known they as a deep source of knowledge and science but also they played crucial roles in students' life surprisingly.
Nowadays, it has been changed the view to the teachers. One should think and remember values and their capabilities to students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 23, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...elling reasons. To begin with, in the past time, people had rare access to scientific s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...more, teachers played more roles in the students life career. They involved in miscellan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 146, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s of the student and they tried to give some of the helps them. So they were effective pers...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 117, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ey when my father got into trouble in a period of time. He says he always consulted with his t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in general, in particular, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01457725948 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71406493263 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9164871791 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.53405017921 221% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373676590466 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126070583786 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135295268963 0.0737576698707 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194902826133 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156640131937 0.0645574589148 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.