Technology has been key to development. Meanwhile, I believe it has caused a decline in children’s creativeness than from the past. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explain in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, technology has made everything readily available in a couple of clicks. There is hardly any information that is difficult to obtain. For instance, I got my programming skills in a hard way, going through ample books and visiting tons of libraries. This happened not more than 15 years ago. Meanwhile, kids these days can access to hundreds and thousands of materials online, some without spending a single penny. Rightly said, necessity is the mother of inventions, I found ways to solve the problems efficiently, for I was really spending a lot of my time, money, and energy on them whereas the children of this generation won’t put much effort on anything, as everything is coming so easy to them.
Secondly, as far as technology has changed our lives for good in so many ways, it has also been draining out the innovation from the kids. The little ones these days are born with technological devices so much so that it is not easy to move them away from it which in many ways, has been affecting their mental health. Drawing from my own experience, my friend’s child of 7 years does nothing but stares at the screen all day long. As a result, he is so exhausted that he is not interested in any creative activities his school carries out, be it origami, mind games, or any of that. However, when his father was a kid, he used to take part in all of the school activities and was an active student, partly because he did not spend time choosing from the tons of gadgets that his son has today.
In light of the above-mentioned facts, I believe that technology today has drained the creative side of children. This is because they have every bit of information right on their palms and at the same time, it is doing more harm to their mental activeness than good.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a hard way" with adverb for "hard"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r instance, I got my programming skills in a hard way, going through ample books and visiting...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ther was a kid, he used to take part in all of the school activities and was an active stu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, as to, for instance, i feel, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6404494382 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69521264291 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1007246335 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115275077728 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429731737263 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483079779481 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850033599881 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036468494908 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a hard way" with adverb for "hard"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r instance, I got my programming skills in a hard way, going through ample books and visiting...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ther was a kid, he used to take part in all of the school activities and was an active stu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, as to, for instance, i feel, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6404494382 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69521264291 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1007246335 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115275077728 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429731737263 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483079779481 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850033599881 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036468494908 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.